GOD, THEY SO WANT TO BE WHITE
Kardashian Blonde
It's sad isn't it? They think because their mom has some Nordic genes that they can play the game. Sorry, Kardashian sisters but unless you have those light green eyes and mousey blond hair, you just cannot pull off both ends of the spectrum. Stick with your Gypsy appeal. You'll never be able to pull off the cool blond anymore than Heigl but she still has a better shot than you.
Posted by sickitten at Friday, June 04. 2010 
Categories: Kim Kardashian
Tags: Kim Kardashian Wishes She Was White
Categories: Kim Kardashian
Tags: Kim Kardashian Wishes She Was White
"Light green eyes and mousy blonde hair"? None of them hair those features, not even Kris' younger kids she had with Bruce Jenner. But they all do have a self-hate issue with being mutts. I've been noticing this for years with countless female celebrities. They need to stop trying to be something they can never be(Oh and getting with a white guy just makes it more obvious and looks worse. Halle Berry has this problem as well. You should make a post about all these non-white wannabes, they need to be called out), no amount of money or surgery can give them these things that they are either blessed with at birth or not.
And only being "half" doesn't cut it. Even if the mother is a pure Scandinavian. Those dark features always come through. Some women, like us, are lucky, and far too many of us don't even realize just how good we have it. Others such as those fake plain sisters aren't. If they stopped trying in vain to be us I wouldn't even be writing this right now. They need to quit lying to themselves and just accept that they didn't hit the genetic lottery because they can't fool the world with those flat faces, dark olive skin with warm undertones and black beady eyes. A blonde wig does not make the rest of their lack-luster "features" more angular. I equate it to throwing glitter on a turd. Totally pointless and majority of people know better.
Reply to this
I love you , BTW, whoever you are but if you look in my archives you'll see I've been touching on this subject forever. There are more KK posts but you need to look under the search options and not her category to the left only. I don't know if you read "Darkies Need To Stop W/The Patinum Blond Hair" but it has gotten close to half a million direct hits since posted. Had to put the comments on moderation for awhile a/that.
I don't think astute people really have a problem w/being mutts as you say. Biracial people are often the most gorgeous, interesting looking people I have found. Not even talking race but just nationality or ethnic background but being purebred as some would like to believe just means your ancestors weren't moving around the world much and pretty much stayed in a small village or remote farm for generations. Everyone should mix up then they'll be less prejudice.
But I do thank the heavens all of the time for my light colored eyes. We can go on about KK but then there are those Gingers w/self-hate like Lohan and Nicole Kidman. You'd love the archives on here re:Kidman. The new Michael Jackson. Ugh!
Reply to this
Whoa, excuse the typos in my last post, kinda forgot to look over the first paragraph there. I actually read everything relative in the archive a couple months back, the "darkie" post was very truth-filled. Fuck the PC bitches who got butt-hurt over it. It needs to be said, even if it comes across as "racist" to others. It's sort of surreal to see someone else posting online the things that have irked me for years.
Furthermore, Hollywood needs a reality check. You can't give every pretty blonde chick role to mutts wearing "white face" (Jessica Alba as Sue Storm anyone?). No one wants to see that. It's not aesthetic to cast someone who doesn't naturally look the least bit like a character. I don't understand why they just don't give it to the actress of the right ethnicity who doesn't have to sit in a makeup chair for half a day to get the required look. It's beyond stubborn, and in the end the girl still looks "off". I have a friend on the other side of the country (who is physically the exact opposite of me oddly enough, over 40, mixed race and he's male), who I talk to about this almost daily... But so far that's really the only other person I've come across that calls this shit for what it is. So keep up with these entries.
There are some points I don't agree with you entirely on. The bi-racial bit for instance. If they were *really* that beautiful, why is the standard of beauty fair-featured white women? Regardless of status. Majority of mixed races are only considered pretty when they try to look more white (Look at all the poor wannabes in Asia. Their white obsession is so blatant and I'm not the least bit flattered by it). I see that proven time and time again in magazines. It's been that way since the beginning of time basically. I've read science articles on why that is. So no thanks, I love being "pure" and that's something I will always be grateful of. Being made up of 3 different northern European nationalities is good enough for me.
Another is I don't get nearly as annoyed with the redheads attempting to look Nordic (and in case you're wondering I have naturally "dirty" blonde/light brown hair). At least they're still the correct race to pull off the hair color. The skin tone isn't going to clash against the hair. But something that you definitely have been spot on about it is needing to have strong bone structure (i.e prominent cheekbones and etc) to look appropriate with platinum locks. Super light hair will just make a plain face even more obvious. I liken it to a flaw magnifying glass.
Reply to this