AVERAGE LOOKING ANGELINA
SShhhhhhhh...Don't tell the Brangeloonies. Even w/nose jobs, cheek implants and who else knows what. The best skincare, etc. Even w/photochop, this one will never be a true beauty. What is up w/the holy wonk eye? Seems everyone has either eye going in another direction. Is this the truth or just bad photochop?
Posted by sickitten at Friday, March 26. 2010 
Categories: Angelina Jolie, Plain Janes, Brangeloonies, Brangelina
Tags: Average Plain Angelina
Categories: Angelina Jolie, Plain Janes, Brangeloonies, Brangelina
Tags: Average Plain Angelina
Actually for close-up shots, her kind of accentuated features should do good -- c'mon, definitely dynamic, not mousy; the problem is, in a big face on a big head, with a scrawny body on slightly above average height just don't go together.... Some celebrities can carry off wearing 5" heels but on her, 4" makes her appear all head and all feet. Her face, btw, is tweaked beyond belief on one shot showed the stiches, on another showed a biodegradable tape that disappears in 6 month but during which one could use to pull one's facial skin, weird abnormal muscles (like claws) around the jaw area "experts" said was abnormal, may be due to her having zero body fat, etc. You've got it, "who knows what else" maybe skeletal but not Kelly Rippa, this one has surgical work invovled She's far craftier & slick than Aniston for sure. She always gave me the creeps and that hasn't changed...
Reply to this
No her wayward eye shots are photo-effect; her eyes have never been an issue before and all her other shots are normal...(sorry)
Reply to this